sparkalot
Lady-in-Waiting

Karma: +21/-15
Offline
Posts: 820
|
 |
« on: December 28, 2008, 10:34:35 PM » |
|
Sorry the list is kinda crappy. It is from and old pdf file and I can't seem to copy it exactly as is or transfer it to photobucket. I am just learning vista. I hope this helps some.
LATCH • Appendix B: Vehicle Information • Modified 4/20/05 • © 2005 Safe Ride News Publications 105 LATCH: Quick Reference List (Lists may not be all-inclusive) Brand* Exceptions LATCH Tether Notes by model maximum maximum name (lower & tether) used with safety belt Acura 40 40 Audi–all except 48 48 A4 Cabriolet 40 40 Convertible, no tether anchors TT Coupe 40 40 Buick 48 40 Cadillac 48 40 Chevrolet/Geo 48 40 Chrysler 48 48 Dodge 48 48 Ford 48 60–80 60 for shell-type CR, 80 for harness/vest GMC 48 40 Honda 40 40 Hummer 48 40 Jeep/Eagle 48 48 Lincoln 48 60–80 60 for shell-type CR, 80 for harness/vest Mercedes-Benz 40 40 Mercury 48 60–80 60 for shell-type CR, 80 for harness/vest Oldsmobile 48 40 Plymouth 48 48 Pontiac 48 40 Porsche 39 55 Saab 40 40 Saturn 48 40 Subaru 60 60 Volkswagen–all except 48 48 Passat (pre-9/04) 40 40 New Beetle 40 40 * If brand is not listed, the vehicle manufacturer defers to child restraint instructions or give no guidance. Maximum Weights of Children Using CRs Installed With LATCH and/or Tether Anchors Using LATCH Terms Correctly “LATCH” is often used incorrectly to refer to lower anchors. It is important to make the following distinctions clear: LATCH: the entire system—lower anchors/attachments and (for forward-facing seats) tether anchor/tether. Lower anchors: the pair of bars in the seat bight. Lower attachments: the equipment on a CR that attaches to the lower anchors. Tether anchor: the vehicle hardware for the tether. Tether: the top strap used with lower anchors or safety belt.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Carissa, sparkalot, mommy to Adam 5/19/05 And Megan 12/27/07
|
|
|
sparkalot
Lady-in-Waiting

Karma: +21/-15
Offline
Posts: 820
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: December 28, 2008, 10:56:29 PM » |
|
The First numbers are Latch max and the second numbers are Tether Max with seat belt.
I didn't know Subaru's can latch to 60lbs!! I wish they would all test to that.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Carissa, sparkalot, mommy to Adam 5/19/05 And Megan 12/27/07
|
|
|
NBB
It is really, really cold now.
Global Moderator
Duchess
   
Karma: +400/-119
Offline
Posts: 17438
Well Hello!
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: December 29, 2008, 11:38:08 AM » |
|
Thank you for sharing this. I am going to sticky it so people can see it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Help End Pet Overpopulation: Spay or neuter your pet!
"Do you know the cost of future misery? Have you lost your sense of sustainability?"
|
|
|
|
chickabiddy
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: December 29, 2008, 03:00:45 PM » |
|
I want to add that there is unanimous agreement among CPSTs and other experts that seats should be top-tethered even beyond the maximum stated limits. The reasoning behind this is that a top-tether is only intended to reduce head excursion: it is not expected to secure the carseat to the vehicle. If the top-tether fails from overload, it will be AFTER it has already done its job (and there are no reports of a top-tether failing from overload anyhow). Obviously, the lower anchors should not be used beyond the stated limits, because their failure would be catastrophic.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Sustained-nursing, carseat-checking, at-home-working mama to a spirited 5 year old girl.
|
|
|
€ileen
Global Moderator
Her Royal Highness, the Princess
   
Karma: +572/-173
Offline
Posts: 39471
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: December 29, 2008, 03:19:56 PM » |
|
My husband was wondering if there was any harm or any benefit to continuing to use the lower anchors in addition to the seatbelt installation after 40 pounds. Good to know about the top tether!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
chickabiddy
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: December 29, 2008, 03:25:26 PM » |
|
Yes, there probably is.
No carseat or vehicle manufacturer allows the use of lower anchors and seatbelt simultaneously. This means that it's either never been tested or it has been tested and failed the testing. Although I have absoluitely no proof, I tend to lean towards the latter, simply because I can't believe that no one ever thought to test it. Either way -- untested or failed -- it's not something I'd want to use for my child.
Both seatbelts and LATCH belts stretch about 20%(? -- if anyone really cares I can double-check that number) in a crash. That stretch is vital. It allows the carseat to "ride down", which lessens the impact. If it doesn't move at all, it's like running into a brick wall -- not good. Theoretically, if the LATCH belt and seatbelt are used together, the optimum ride-down may be shortened. Again, this is theory -- but it makes sense. And regardless of any of my theorizing, see above -- it's just not safe.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Sustained-nursing, carseat-checking, at-home-working mama to a spirited 5 year old girl.
|
|
|
€ileen
Global Moderator
Her Royal Highness, the Princess
   
Karma: +572/-173
Offline
Posts: 39471
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: December 29, 2008, 03:37:03 PM » |
|
Thanks! That makes sense.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Shannon
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: December 29, 2008, 04:50:11 PM » |
|
Thanks chickabiddy! And sparkalot, for finding this information. It seems something so important should be more widely known.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Thank you for my life. I wouldn't have had one if you hadn't borned me." - Aidan
|
|
|
|
BeachMama
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: December 29, 2008, 08:12:42 PM » |
|
Good to know because I could not find any weight limits in my car manual.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Kayden 3/22/00 Karson 4/3/02 Oscar 1/6/06
|
|
|
|